More in: Issue Briefs. Case remanded to Agency for further investigation of Complainant's harassment claims where record was devoid of any evidence that Complainant's co-workers, including the alleged harasser, were interviewed during the investigation. For questions or concerns please contact our offices: Thomas & Solomon LLP - [About the Firm] 693 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14607 (877) 272-4066 (telephone M-F 8:30AM-5:30PM EST) (585) 272-0574 (facsimile) This represents a decrease of 482 employees from FY 2008 and a decrease of 794 employees since FY 2005. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone)
Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's determination that the Agency discriminated against Complainant on the basis of race when it terminated his employment as a sales store checker during his probationary period; the AJ found Complainant to be credible, the Agency's stated reason (that Complainant had an altercation with a bagger) was not believable, the evidence showed that those terminated during their probationary period were predominantly African-Americans, and a Caucasian employee who also had an altercation with the bagger did not receive any disciplinary action. The Cost to your Company. Your claim in this case is a personal asset. Darin B. v. Office of Personnel Management, EEOC Appeal No. The bases of alleged discrimination most often raised were: (1) Reprisal; (2) Disability (Physical); and (3) Age. On July 15, 2022, USPS submitted a spreadsheet to the EEOC Administrative Judge, and also to us as Phase I Class Counsel. Silas T. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. In the case of Sandra McConnell, et al. 22, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2020001154.pdf. The Commission declined to review the award of $54,403.80 for reimbursement of Padillas withdrawal of funds from his Thrift Savings Plan account to support himself following his removal as neither party challenged this award on appeal. The U.S. If you have questions contact the EEOC at: 131 M Street, NE
2020000109 (Oct. 26, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020000109.pdf. Sharon M. v. Dep't of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. Class members should expect to receive written notice concerning the claim procedure within the next month. The AJ took account of several factors that limited Complainants non-pecuniary damages award, found that the Agency was not the sole cause of Complainants emotional and psychological harm, and limited the award of pecuniary damages to the amounts contained in "legitimate receipts.". According to the decision, Phase 1 of NRP consisted largely of reviewing the files and medical records of all these employees; where needed requesting updated medical documentation from the employee; and verifying that current work actually being performed matched the current job offer. Share sensitive 3, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180137.pdf. January 17, 2020 - Status Update - Pittman Settlement Letters. Republican President Donald Trump has unleashed new threats to privatize the USPS in recent years, against which thousands of postal workers in cities across the US protested in 2018. Deandre C. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC Appeal No. The Agency provided insufficient evidence to support its dismissal of a complaint, on the basis that Complainant was not an Agency employee, where the record that the Agency submitted contained only the EEO Counselor's Report, the Notice of Right to File a Discrimination Complaint, and the formal complaint; the Agency did not provide any contracts or affidavits from management officials regarding the day-to-day responsibilities and management of Complainant's position. 2021001898 (Apr. Workers in the class action suit claim that this is false and that other workers had to speed up to cover their heavy workloads after they were fired. The Postal Service and Postal Inspection Service appropriately addressed all workplace violence cases in the six selected districts reviewed. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Sang G. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. According to the Commission, there was evidence of at least five incidents over a one year period where the agency failed to accommodate complainant's hearing impairment. Expecting every potential class member to undertake the individualized inquiry that the Rehabilitation Act requires during the liability phase is impractical and unworkable; it is more efficient and effective to require prospective class members to prove that they are qualified individuals with disabilities during the remedies phase of the proceeding, because that is where proof of ones status as a qualified individual with a disability under the Rehabilitation Act naturally aligns with proof of ones membership in a class. Carriers also risk injury from lifting heavy bins, squatting, repeatedly getting in and out of mail trucks, walking up and down stairs, and walking to deliver mail in inclement weather, putting them at greater risk for slips and falls as well as joint injuries. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. Minda W. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. Employee lawsuits are expensive. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone), Call 1-800-669-4000
Complainant, the only African-American plumber at the facility where he worked, was subjected to a hostile work environment based on race when coworkers tampered with his toolbox and left notes in it saying that African Americans did not have the skill sets to be plumbers, attempted to restrain him to a chair with a metal clamp, referred to him as a goat, and duct-taped him to a chair; the Agency was liable for the racial harassment because it did not take immediate and appropriate corrective action after Complainant reported the first, toolbox incident. Thersa E. v. U.S. 0120090062 (9/21/10). *Includes only complaints filed in FY 2009 where counseling was also completed during FY 2009. If there is not enough evidence to hold the employer liable, the victim could end up with nothing. The class action suit is currently open and continues to process claims from approximately 28,000 victimized postal workers. EEOC finds that a USPS employee claims of discrimination and retaliation were not sufficiently investigated by the agency. Due to the increasing use of email and the internet for correspondence and document delivery, the volume of first-class mail processed by the USPS declined by 43 percent in 2017 from its peak in 2001. Administrative Judge properly ordered Agency to stop issuing cease-and-desist letters to employees who have reported discrimination, absent clear, documented evidence of some conduct (other than reporting discrimination) that the Agency reasonably concludes would warrant discipline in the absence of the employee's protected activity; issuing Complainant a cease-and-desist letter gave the appearance that Complainant, who complained of ongoing racial and sexual harassment, was just as culpable as her harasser. 2021001514 (June 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2021001514.pdf. I know I use to be a Union Steward for National Association of Letter Carriers for seven years. USPS employee wins discrimination and harassment claim with the EEOC. Malinda F. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. Terisa B. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal Nos. Padilla v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. We will update the list periodically with the most recently issued decisions. After the 1970 postal workers strike against the federal government, the USPS was formed to replace the US Postal Department, which was funded by Congress, with an organization that was run like a business, but which is not a government-owned corporation. The final ruling from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission came more than 10 years after a former employee first filed a class complaint alleging USPS subjected employees to a "pattern. 0120170676 (Oct. 31, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170676.pdf. 0720170034 (June 15, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720170034.txt. Postal Service who have been subjected to the National Reassessment Process (NRP) from May 5, 2006 to present, allegedly in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Copyright 2023 The Angel Law Firm, PLLC. The EEOC in making its award of $165,000 in compensatory damages noted that Padilla had asserted that he had both emotional and physical suffering since his termination, lost custody of his daughter, hasnt been able to see his daughter since his former wife and daughter relocated, lost friendships, has slept in his car and frequently didnt have any food. 0120131989 (Oct. 26, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120131989.txt. Complainant not entitled to personal relief for discriminatory non-selection where substantial evidence of record supported Administrative Judge's conclusion that Agency canceled the selection process because of a violation of the collective bargaining agreement and would not have selected Complainant for the position absent the discrimination. Fiona H. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. Complainant established that she was subjected to a hostile work environment because of her sex where a coworker made several offensive comments to her about her sexual orientation, including "you need a man in your life" and "I do not think same sex couples should be allowed to get married"; Complainant asserted that the comments occurred on a weekly basis, and other coworkers corroborated that the comments occurred. 0120171405 (Mar. workers that this case involved. endstream
endobj
512 0 obj
<. 2019005957 (Apr. I have plenty to say, but will hold my peace as it is very disturbing of what the Postal Service did not only to me, but to all Rehab or Injured employees at Van Nuys District. A lock ( Complainant subjected to a hostile work environment based on sex where subordinate disparaged him because of his sexual orientation and managers, who placed the onus on Complainant to discipline the harasser or file an EEO complaint, failed to take prompt and effective action; because Agency did not have an effective anti-harassment policy, Agency was ordered to seek technical assistance from EEOC's Office of Federal Operations and to correct the policy's deficiencies. 0120162132 (June 22, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162132.txt. Summary judgment in favor of Agency appropriate where there were no genuine issues of material fact or credibility that merited a hearing; record showed that Agency issued Complainant a Letter of Counseling because of allegations that he had used improper language of a vulgar or sexual nature and that Agency discharged him during his probationary period due to his repeated discourteous behavior; Complainant provided no evidence that raised a genuine issue of material fact that any of his protected bases played a role in the Agency's actions. The Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider appeals from Peace Corps volunteers and applicants, who have a separate EEO complaint process outside Commission jurisdiction; although Complainant filed her complaint against the State Department, it concerned a Peace Corps volunteer position over which the Commission did not have jurisdiction. Lara G. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 2020003134 (Oct. 15, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_01_19/2020003134.pdf. 0120150846 (Nov. 10, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120150846.txt. 0120182095 (June 23, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/0120182095.pdf. 0120180192 (Sept. 25, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180192.pdf. However, some of the funds were held back to ensure that all affected clerks would receive back pay. A class actioncomplaintfor injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. Colby S. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Gabriele G. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. Where there is an actionable third-party retaliation, both the employee who engaged in the protected activity and the third party who is subjected to the materially adverse action may state a claim. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. The suit alleges that the USPS routinely harassed and discriminated against injured workers and refused to provide reasonable accommodations to workers who had become disabled as a result of their injuries. Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit Posted on December 14, 2020 by postal A class action complaint for injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit, nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com, Syracuse NY Postal Carrier Charged with Discarding Mail, Kubayanda Resumes Role as Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman, Florida Postal Clerk Sentenced To Prison For Stealing Mail, Passport Applications To Commit Bank Fraud, Nebraska man gets prison for impersonating USPS Postal Inspector, U.S. 511 0 obj
<>
endobj
0120161068 (Mar. 2020002285 (Apr. "A$~
XD,R=T0Y& IkN =@&F>_ {. Foster B. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. 0120180917 (Oct. 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180917.pdf. Genny L. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 0120162491 (July 25, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162491.pdf. Ramon L. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Sheila D. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Petition No. 529 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<1FB7EE72CCD9854B90DCFC8A33497EB8><1B534663FC186A42AEFC8BA0152CE4CF>]/Index[511 26]/Info 510 0 R/Length 94/Prev 400457/Root 512 0 R/Size 537/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream
An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. Phyllis F. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 2019002760 (Aug. 18, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019002760.pdf. EEOC Awards $165,000 in Compensatory Damages The EEOC recently awarded $165,000 in non-pecuniary damages for pain and suffering to an employee of the U.S. Agency failed to take prompt and effective action to address Complainant's claim of sexual harassment; a supervisor's fear of retaliation by his or her superior is an insufficient argument for failing to take action as a supervisor.
managers discussing employees with other employees uk,
bang energy drinks and heart problems,